Source review
Current platform guidance
The Google review guidance linked below was checked on 12 October 2026. Confirm the requirements for any other platform before using the same request process there.
Same ambition. Your atmosphere.
Mineral and Volt are saved in this browser. Choose Ember to clear that saved choice and use the standard appearance.Customer review guide
Choose appropriate timing, make the review link easy to use and keep the invitation independent of ratings, rewards and private feedback scores.
A Practical Guide to Asking for Customer Reviews
A review request should invite a genuine customer to describe their experience in their own words. Keep the message short, explain why they are receiving it and make the destination clear. Participation remains their choice. The process matters as much as the wording. A neutral message does not fix a journey that invites only satisfied customers. Keep public invitations separate from satisfaction filtering and keep rewards independent of posting, changing or removing reviews.
Ask after a genuine customer interaction at a point that makes sense for the service. The recipient should understand why the request arrived. Define how repeat requests are avoided.
A simple invitation can say: Thank you for choosing us. If you would like to share your experience, you can leave an honest review here. Use a verified destination and adapt the wording to the actual interaction.
Check that it reaches the correct business and that the invitation explains what the link does. QR materials should be readable in the place they are used and should not conceal an unrelated destination.
A private survey can help the business learn, but a low score should not remove the customer’s opportunity to review publicly. Give service concerns a useful resolution route without filtering the public invitation.
A discount, prize or loyalty benefit should not depend on a customer posting, changing or removing a review. The promotion and review request need separate purposes and journeys.
Agree who handles routine reviews and which comments need sensitive-case review. Public replies should protect private information. Recurring feedback may reveal a service improvement beyond the response itself.
Review whether requests reach appropriate customers, whether the link works and whether staff can act on feedback. Sent requests and received reviews are different measures. Participation and the content of a review remain the customer’s choice.
Sources
Platform guidance. Not an Ascent result.
Reviews should reflect genuine experiences; incentives for posting, changing or removing reviews are prohibited.
Checked: 2026-10-12
Suitability
Source review
The Google review guidance linked below was checked on 12 October 2026. Confirm the requirements for any other platform before using the same request process there.
Explore the next step
Use the guide to identify your next practical improvement, then explore the service if you need help with implementation.